As you gaze across the bobbing sea of heads and cameras, meeting Mona Lisa’s eyes across the room, as the echoes of the constant murmur of “no photo” from Italian polizia fills the Sistine Chapel, as the man next to you exclaims, “It’s a unicorn,” and laughs at the absurdity of the Crown Jewels, one begins to ponder the nature of tourism.
On this trip we have spent not an inconsiderable amount of time in what I would term “dead” monuments. The Tower holds no more executions, no kings live in Neuscwanstein, and the last battle in the coliseum, well, you get the idea.
It’s part of why I enjoy visiting places of worship. Because most of them are still alive.
Now, I will not pretend to be the most reverent of visitors to these embalmed places. I quite enjoy the imagined consternation of the Hapsburg ghosts as they see their venerated grounds invaded by the masses. But why do we go? Where is the line between overprotective snobbery and appreciation, between good humor and a loss of wonder?
When we were wandering the Louvre Chelsea and I were passed by a gentleman with a camera. He walked directly to each case in the room, snapped a photo and walked on. Without looking at what was there. This baffled us then, and still does. Where is the worth in that? What was the point of your admission? To say that you were there?
(And again, I am not above doing some things for the mere purpose of making a factual statement. We took a train ride to Malmo and back, and proudly count Sweden on our itinerary. Yes, yes, laugh at us.)
All of this makes Venice an interesting case. Venice, we were told, is a city of tourists. The old town, the part everyone thinks of when we think of Venice, gave us no evidence to the contrary. We heard a lot of languages, and very little Italian. There were street hawkers and cheap masks, gaudy gondolas and plenty of “I heart Venice” shirts.
And yet.
Some mask shops boast finer ware: fragile metal butterflies and swirls of stiff fabric, glittering crystal and delicate flourishes of gold. Some canals are still a breathtaking aqua, and some streets are deserted, left for the dreamers who wish they were wearing cloaks and lace and had important business about in the floating city.
And then it is back to the irreverent noise of cameras coming on and gelato running down your fingers. And the ice cream is marvelous, and you’ll be glad you got that shot later, when you are trying to convince yourself that you ever traveled halfway around the world.
If any of this seems to contradict itself, then I suppose that’s my point. I don’t know if there is a solution. I don’t know if there is a problem. I’d be sad if these treasures were locked from sight, I am sad that our dead have so little weight.
In many ways, the fact that tourists exist at all means that such wonders have great attraction to us and that those things that our dead left behind that mean so much to the people who travel to see them (possibly excluding Mr. Picture-snapper--I'm not sure he cares)tell us that our history as humans, and our dead as well, have great weight to us. Even Mr Picture-snapper may have a kinder story--perhaps he wanted very much to stop and look at each of those cases, but for whatever reason, did not have the time to enjoy them as he wished and so took pictures to enjoy what he could later. Or then, he could just be as ass. One can never tell these days, unfortunately. Nonetheless, we go and appreciate the things that others have left behind in ways that even the people who live within them do not. So often we take for granted that which surrounds us, leaving the wonder and awe to those who may only ever see them once. Tourism may be, in and of itself, contradictory in nature, but the appreciation and joy of the wonders that we travel to see is not. :)
ReplyDelete